Huge wealth inequality is a major feature of Venezuelan society. This continues to undermine sustainable development and contributes to political instability. It already looks unlikely that Venezuela will meet all of its Millennium Development goals (1990 - 2015) on poverty reduction despite the reforming zeal and promises of the current administration.

This explains the popularity of reforms designed to bring about a less unequal society in opposition to powerful vested interests in maintaining the status quo. The current administration has labelled the reform and poverty reduction agenda as the “Bolivarian Revolution” and is using oil industry profits to finance social programmes aimed at reducing poverty.

The Venezuelan economy is dependent on its oil industry and approximately one third of its Gross Domestic Product (GDP) and more than 50% of government revenues are generated from oil and its derivatives. The government has made efforts to diversify into the exploitation of other mineral reserves including iron, aluminium, coal, and cement; and is trying to close the infrastructure gap in transportation and energy supply.

The government is also privatising loss making state owned enterprises and seeking foreign investment in petrochemical, mining, forestry and tourism - albeit with a strict emphasis on state control of assets. Tax collection is being improved and now accounts for the other 50% of governmental revenue.

GDP has risen by more than 600% since 1996 reaching 206,125 billion Bolivar’s in 2004. The figures for 2001 and 2002 would have been higher had it not been for the nine week national strike and general shut down which affected industrial production. During this period economic activity and oil output fell dramatically but have recovered since. For 2005 the official GDP exchange rate figure is expected to be around $116.2 billion which represents an annual growth rate of over 9%.

Other Latin American countries have been experiencing similar gains and the economic outlook for the whole region is positive for the short to medium term. If the current social and anti poverty policies prove effective, barriers to economic participation should lower and this in turn will increase GDP and tax revenues. However unemployment has hovered stubbornly high for the last decade and around 12% of the 12 million strong workforce were unemployed in 2005.

Consumer prices in Venezuela were high in the 1990s but have fallen since 1998. Figures for 2006 are expected to fall a further 5% according to the International Monetary Fund (IMF). High inflation levels have historically been a big problem for Latin American economies and other developing countries. During the 1970s, 1980s and 1990s high inflation was largely the result of commodity price shocks and loose fiscal and monetary policies. The former of these was particularly problematic for Venezuela because its economy is based primarily on producing, and exporting, primary goods.

The main unit of currency in Venezuela is the Bolivar. In February 2002 the Venezuelan government abolished the exchange rate controls and the Bolivar fell 25% against the US dollar. The Bolivar has continued to depreciate against the dollar and the average annual exchange rate in 2005 was 2,090 Bolivar’s per US$, five times in 1996 when it stood at 417 Bolivar’s per US$.

Surprisingly, given the dominance of the oil industry, Venezuela sources two thirds of its electricity from hydroelectric plants. However it is still a major emitted of carbon dioxide due to its oil industry. Mining operations especially illegal mining is causing environmental damage in rainforests and river courses. Indigenous communities face the destruction of their way of life and violence from the mining industry, and require greater protection from the state. Bari, Yukpa and Wayuu indigenous people from the state of Zulia, many of whom voted for the Fifth Republic, held a demonstration in Caracas against coal mining in Sierra de Perija in 2005.

Gold mining is causing mercury contamination, excessive sedimentation and deforestation. In July 2005 the Minister of Environment and Resources, Jacqueline Faria indicated that the government was intending to ban mining in the state of Amazonas and revise mining operations in the state of Bolivar. Mining operations are banned along the Caroni river due to high levels of mercury and cyanide. Illegal miners are generally vulnerable people who are extremely poor and work in dangerous conditions. Any long term solution to stop illegal mining must provide alternative employment for miners.

Whilst devastating floods hit northern Venezuela in 1999, water shortages have affected the country in more recent years. The government is therefore encouraging domestic consumers to be more careful. At present the cost of water in Venezuela is 700 Bolivar’s per 1,000 litres but the government is indicating that this price will increase. Currently only 21% of sewage is properly treated but the government claims that it will increase this to 40% by 2010.

Lake Maracaibo faces many environmental threats including pollution from oil tankers, excessive growth of duckweed which thrives on nutrients carried downstream and subsidence as a result of hydrocarbon extraction in the Maracaibo basin. Pollution from industry has also compromised Lake Valencia and the government is trying to improve water quality in the lake.

The threat to Venezuela’s environment, and indigenous communities, will continue to grow as the government pursues a development strategy based on exploiting minerals such as gold and oil revenue. Grand infrastructure projects will also be difficult to manage and construct. However, reducing social inequalities by investing in people through education and health will improve the economy through an expanded skills base and a more cohesive society.

Copyright: Rowena Slope 2006 (Redkite Research)

Redkite Research is an internet based company providing research and information services including speech writing, reports and presentations. For more information please go to: http://www.redkite-research.com

Tags: economy, , , , , , , , , environment, exchange rate, GDP, gold mining, indigenous community, Inflation, Maracaibo, Venezuela

When this president’s father was in the Oval Office, he was fond of singing the praises of the “New World Order” that was to arrive. The phrase carried a lot of baggage, especially with conservatives who had long heard the term associated with a one-world government with little room for individual rights. Some believe the first George Bush’s attachment to this term hurt his chances for re-election, and contributed to the movement that brought Ross Perot into the fray and split the conservative vote.

The current president has steered clear of the specific terminology, but only an ostrich with his head in the sand would say that we are not moving headlong toward a reorganization of the world system, and it has become clear that individual rights are at risk. The war in Afghanistan was not only inevitable, but was probably desirable. Iraq was no ones’ friend, and even those of us who questioned the wisdom of invasion had difficulty opposing the end of such an abusive regime. However the trend is disturbing as we now speak casually of invading Syria, Iran, or North Korea. Not only does the war posturing make us globally unpopular (and therefore unable to extol the virtues of free markets), wars also bring with them serious limits on freedom at home. We’ve begun to see some of that.

Laws like the Patriot Act are so comprehensive that most of us are likely violating a half dozen edicts without knowing it. The difference this time is that conservatives are largely supportive of all these actions. Strangely, all the things that Bill Clinton could never have gotten past the Republican Congress are sailing through with little forethought.

Meanwhile, we have lost the attention of nations around the world. We imagined that the menace of communist based philosophies died with the Berlin Wall, but now we are faced with socialists winning elections worldwide. The new look of the “World Order” is not a pretty one, and clearly not one that values freedom. Yet we have no voice in world affairs, where many smaller nations have begun to view America as a bully. The fact that we are “in the right” isn’t important in this area, as one cannot force freedom’s acceptance. It is a tenuous choice that a nation must make for itself. The approach we’ve taken recently has limited our ability to offer our wisdom.

In light of these world changes, it may be wise to consider our investment strategies. It is fair to say that investing overseas may meet with some difficulty, but if trends continue, we may see trouble here as well. Alas, so much of American business success is due to exports, yet we’re faced with protectionist barriers coming up against us in many nations. Some of this is justified, because although other nations tend to have much higher barriers, America has recently begun to impose rather restrictive tariffs as well. The idea of a free-trade zone, such as NAFTA, actually is an enemy to true free trade, because it actually prevents free trade with nations outside the limited trade bloc.

All of this may eventually impact American companies, as they find international trade opportunities severely restricted. The past two decades were a time of relative freedom internationally for travel, trade, and discussion. That may change, and if it does, the impact could be devastating. The last time we restricted world trade to this extent, the period culminated in the great depression. We’re a long way from that today, but without some wise leadership, we may find ourselves facing further difficulties. Thus far, sadly, this administration has shown little strength in economic issues.

Changes in the world make our investment strategies critical to our future. More than ever, a careful plan is vital to our ability to weather the storms that may come in the economy.

To send comments or to learn more about Scott Pearson’s Investment Management Service, visit http://www.valueview.net

Scott Pearson is an investment advisor, writer, editor, instructor, and business leader. As President and Chief Investment Officer of Value View Financial Corp., he offers investment management services to a wide variety of clients. His own newsletter, Investor’s Value View, is distributed worldwide and provides general money tips and investment advice to readers both internationally, and in the U.S.

Tags: economy, , , , , , , , finance, financial advice, future, investing, investment advice, stock market, value stocks

Next »